So, here's some cold Dish for you. Yesterday, our largest issue of the year went to press. I worked twice my hours last month working on it. Everything around me is in shambles, but hey... it's going to be a great issue! So if you see it, pick it up, so I feel like all my hard work went to something (other than just paying our bills).
Since I'm SICK of being on the computer and I need to get back to my life, here's just some quick LUNCH RUSH bits to tide us over.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Jude's Thursday Dish
Posted by Jude at 8:51 AM 0 comments
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Jude's Thursday Dish
I'm trying to get to this first thing this morning, because I have a full day ahead. So, on to Dish!
Posted by Jude at 8:25 AM 0 comments
Monday, March 16, 2009
Winter, are we through?
Middle of March and I've been ready for spring since February 15th. The snow on my lawn has FINALLY melted. My house faces north, so it takes forever for my lawn to de-thaw. The sunshine is more than welcome for my S.A.D. soul. So to usher in what I hope is the end of the snow and even though spring doesn't officially start until Wednesday, I wanted to post some pictures of our winter and be done with it!
Disclaimer: Yes, there are no pictures of me... on purpose. Not until I lose some of this winter fat and all the fat from seasons prior!



Posted by Jude at 8:43 AM 2 comments
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Jude's Thursday Dish
Since all my blog postings are called "Jude's Thursday Dish" lately, I'm wondering if I need to tack on a subtitle or even an episode number like "Jude's Thursday Dish #40" or something. Or a subtitle could be "Jude's Thursday Dish - yes, all she talks about is Lost." Hmmm? Any thoughts?
I only have time for one entry today, so here we go...
1. I've been thinking about this for days and I don't really know where to begin. How can I not dish about the "Big Love" controversy? Yes, I'm going there. Not all of my friends have the same beliefs as I do, but I know they all respect my opinion and don't mind if I go off on church stuff once in a while. :) As you know, I'm a little more liberal about my entertainment than more conservative members of my religion. I fully respect people's right for their freedom of speech, but I'm completely offended by HBO's choice to depict a temple marriage on TV. Just because you have the freedom to DO something, doesn't mean you should. There's something to be said about creating entertainment that's sensitive to its audience. Yes, Mormons watch "Big Love" and Mormons watch "HBO"; we are their audience. Clearly, even though they cite it's important to their plot, they know depicting a sacred temple ordinance would be offensive to active LDS members. It's for certain embittered ex-Mormons are the people advising them in this subject and it's really disappointing they have such little regard for such sensitive matters. I like this quote: “The rituals and the teachings that take place in those we consider to be sacred and not appropriate for public view,” says BYU Associate Dean of Religion Kent Jackson. “Latter-day Saints will find this very disheartening that something like this is taking place.” Jackson says this shows an insensitivity to sacred things. “Good people honor other people’s sense of the sacred.” We're not the only religion, or group for that matter, that holds things sacred. It shows such little regard and tolerance for those of any faith to exploit their beliefs or rituals. Taken out of context, these things give us further reason to be misunderstood. I've been really impressed by the Church's PR department and how they've handled it. Their statements have been really articulate and thought out. I also admire their Christlike attitude of not calling on a ban to HBO or bringing more attention to it. It just goes to show you how "peculiar" we really are. Being"peculiar" used to allude to "oh, they're kind of different", but as the world is getting more and more divided in their beliefs, being "peculiar" is becoming truer to its real definition:
1. Unusual or eccentric; odd.
2. Distinct from all others.
3. Belonging distinctively or primarily to one person, group, or kind; special or unique.
Anyway, the whole thing really disappoints me. I'm not in the group of banning HBO or their programs, mainly because I don't HAVE HBO and all I do is watch "Sex and the City" reruns on TBS. It's probably going to bum these banners out when they realize Tom Hanks produces "Big Love" so if you're going to ban anyone involved in the show, does that mean you have to ban everyone's favorite "Should be a Mormon" actor?
Posted by Jude at 2:38 PM 3 comments
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Jude's Thursday Dish
I haven't had a lot of time to put into my blog and now, I'm going to have less. I have a lot of stuff going on right now. Our biggest issue of the year is coming up for April. We no longer have a sales manager, so I'm going to have my work cut out for me trying to pitch in. I'm working on the script for our ward play "The Wizard of Oz" and I'm working on getting donations for the school's fundraiser on April 3rd. All this on top of my normal life. So, if my blog is neglected and my house isn't clean, so be it. I'm just doing the best I can.
Posted by Jude at 9:06 AM 3 comments
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Early LOSTapolooza!
I can't wait until tomorrow to dish about LOST. I just have to say I HEART Sawyer. He is the MAN! He's become the heart of this show. While the 06ers have been tormented over the last 3 years, he's been this happy, realized, well-adjusted guy living in the 70's! And the best part, he's in a good relationship with Juliet! Of course he's not going to be hanging out, celibate and waiting for Kate. He's hot and so is Juliet. They totally have a connection. He obviously wasn't too heartbroken Kate was gone, because he must've hooked up with Juliet shortly after since she didn't leave on the sub 2 weeks later. Anyway, I have a complete girl-crush on Juliet. I've decided 2 things: 1.) Josh Holloway has chemistry with anyone and that's why I can't decide who I want Sawyer with. 2.) Kate doesn't deserve him. I'd really rather see Jack and Sawyer fighting over Juliet not Kate. She has too many issues and shouldn't be with anyone right now (I sound like Dr. Phil). I really don't think Sawyer will just dump Juliet for Kate. That look at the end wasn't really "I'm not over you" but more "I can't believe you're here." I don't know what camp I'm in, but I definitely was digging the Sawyer/Juliet coupling tonight! This show is AWESOME -- they even have us on the edge of our seats re: the romantic pairings -- and never know where it's going!
Posted by Jude at 10:20 PM 3 comments
Sunday, March 1, 2009
What Do YOU Need?
I got this idea from Deidra's blog and thought it was entertaining. In Google, you type in your name and the word needs like "Judy needs" and then post the top 10 results. It's funny how some of these things actually do apply.
1. Judy needs...her morning corree (love the first answer has a typo)
2. Judy needs...to get out of the shelter! (what?)
3. Judy needs....to pay her taxes (that's so true!)
4. Judy needs...her tumor removed. (oh Heavens, let's hope not)
5. (Punch and) Judy needs...counseling. (if we're inserting John for Punch, then sure...why not? Every couple could use a little therapy.)
6. Judy needs...to go to anger management classes (yeah, that probably wouldn't hurt either)
7. Judy needs....a television set (I did, but now I have a fabulous new HDTV!)
8. Judy needs....to learn to become a subservient female (like that will EVER happen)
9. Judy needs...to run for President of the U.S. (or like THAT will ever happen)
10. Judy needs...help for her next charity challenge (how did Google know? I DO! Anyone want to donate something to the Highland Park Arts Silent Auction? Let me know!)
Sooo, what do YOU need?
Posted by Jude at 9:37 PM 1 comments